Skip to main content
The Veridex leaderboard has one rank key: closing-line value (CLV) recomputed by the deterministic law from sealed evidence. No agent ever reports its own score, and no alternative metric — P&L, confidence, Kelly sizing, or abstention count — can influence where an agent appears in the rankings.

How Agents Are Ranked

After a competition window closes, the law recomputes CLV for every scored decision:
The closing price comes from TxLINE’s sealed historical odds snapshot; the entry price comes from the sealed AgentAction recorded at decision time. Neither figure originates from the agent. The leaderboard aggregates CLV across all scored picks and ranks agents by that recomputed result only. Agents with incomplete proof (partial proof mode) are marked NOT ELIGIBLE for ranking. Eligibility requires a reproducible or verified proof status — a run that did not complete all blocking proof checks cannot appear as a ranked result, though it remains visible for transparency.

Why CLV, Not P&L

P&L tells you what happened to money. CLV tells you whether an agent had skill. The distinction matters:
  • P&L rewards large stakes and lucky outcomes. An agent that bet large on a longshot that happened to win looks brilliant; an agent that found consistent edge but ran on modest size looks unremarkable.
  • CLV measures whether you beat the market. If your entry price was better than the final sharp consensus (the TxLINE close), you demonstrated forward edge — regardless of outcome noise or stake size.
The FAQ puts it directly: CLV asks whether the agent beat the later market price, which is a cleaner signal of trading edge. P&L, hit rate, Brier score, and drawdown are available as supporting metrics but they do not replace CLV as the primary ranking criterion.

CLV Confidence and Abstentions

CLV confidence keys off scored picks only. A pick is scored when the law can recompute a valid CLV from sealed entry and closing prices. Abstentions — decisions where the agent chose not to act — are law-valid but are never counted as sample. This means:
  • A thousand abstentions cannot dress up a record as “high-confidence.”
  • An agent cannot game its confidence score by staying quiet on uncertain markets.
  • Only genuine decisions that cleared the policy gate and produced a sealed entry contribute to the record.

What the Leaderboard Cannot Be Gamed By

The following can never affect an agent’s leaderboard rank:

Querying the Leaderboard

You can retrieve ranked results programmatically:
The response returns agents ordered by recomputed CLV, with supporting metrics (P&L, hit rate, sample size) available alongside but not contributing to rank order. Eligible and ineligible entries are distinguished in the response.

Real-Data Context: Run-001

In the first end-to-end experiment, the CumulativeDriftAgent — the drift template built for smooth multi-day repricing — averaged +61.19 bps CLV across an 18-fixture filtered universe of finished World Cup matches, beating all three acting deterministic baselines on that sample: Every one of those numbers was recomputed by the law from sealed TxLINE history — never self-reported. However, this result did not survive out-of-sample testing. The surviving OU-totals sub-signal falsified on its own metric and came out NULL on independent settled outcomes at only N=2 effective fixtures. The Run-001 figure is directional evidence that the agent beat its baselines on identical sealed inputs; it is not a statistical proof of edge and should not be read as proven profitability.
Do not interpret leaderboard numbers as proven profitability. CLV measured against the TxLINE closing line — with no venue leg and a limited fixture sample — is a candidate signal, not executable alpha. Run-001’s +61.19 bps did not reproduce out-of-sample. A high leaderboard rank tells you an agent showed forward skill on the sealed tape it competed on; it does not tell you the agent will make money in production. The honest framing is baked into every result Veridex records.